Research and Report Consultancy

Facebook Linkedin X-twitter Youtube
Menu

Research Methods

Why Assuming Variables Are Independent Is Risky

by
Why Assuming Variables Are Independent Is Risky

Statistical independence is one of the most violated assumptions in social science, economics, public health, and data science. Treating variables—or observations—as independent when they are not can break inference, mislead policymakers, and inflate Type I errors.In real-world datasets, hidden dependence structures arise from clustering, networks, spatial proximity, common raters, and temporal patterns. Ignoring these structures … Read more

Why Many Research Instruments Lack Face Validity—And How to Fix It

by
Why Many Research Instruments Fail Face Validity

Face validity is the most intuitive—and often the most ignored—dimension of measurement quality. If respondents cannot immediately understand what a question measures, the resulting data become fragile, regardless of high Cronbach’s alpha, AVE, or composite reliability. Poor face validity leads to misinterpretation, satisficing, social desirability distortions, and ultimately flawed statistical conclusions. In reality, many survey … Read more

Why Data Aggregation Masks Inequality and Vulnerability

by
Why-data-aggregation-masks-inequality-and-vulnerability

Aggregated data often simplifies complex realities into a single number, such as a national poverty rate, an average test score, or a district-level health indicator. While these summaries support fast reporting, they also conceal inequality, mute vulnerability, and distort policy decisions. Policymakers, donors, and researchers frequently rely on aggregated indicators without examining underlying distributions. As … Read more

Gender Dynamics Can Distort Fieldwork Findings

by
Gender Dynamics Can Distort Fieldwork Findings

Most research projects treat gender as a demographic checkbox rather than a structural force that shapes how data is created. However, gender dynamics influence who speaks, what they share, and whether the information captured reflects lived realities. When gender is ignored during fieldwork, the entire evidence base can quietly become biased—leading to misleading conclusions and … Read more

Why Theories Stay Cited, Not Applied

by
Why-Theories-Stay-Cited,-Not-Applied

The research world is full of theories—TAM, TPB, SDT, DOI, Social Learning Theory, and more. They appear across dissertations, journal articles, and conference papers. Yet most theories function as cosmetic citations, not analytical frameworks. Researchers cite them for legitimacy, but rarely apply them rigorously. At Research & Report Consulting, our reviews of 500+ academic manuscripts … Read more

How the Unit of Analysis Can Ruin Your Research

by
How-unit-of-analysis-can-ruin-your-research

Most research failures start long before data analysis. They begin at the design stage, when researchers misidentify the unit of analysis. This single mistake produces misleading results, faulty comparisons, and policy recommendations that collapse when applied in real-world settings. For research, evaluation, and policy studies, choosing the wrong unit of analysis is one of the … Read more

Why Translated Instruments Fail Without Localization

by
Why-translated-instruments-fail-without-localization

Understanding the Problem: Translation Isn’t Enough In global research, translation is often mistaken for localization. Many researchers assume that once a questionnaire or scale is linguistically translated, it becomes universally applicable.However, translation alone rarely guarantees conceptual equivalence—the idea that a question measures the same construct in another language or culture. For example, a “satisfaction survey” … Read more

Triangulation Isn’t Just About Using Three Methods

by
Triangulation-is-not-just-about-using-three-methods

Understanding the Real Meaning of Triangulation In academic and applied research, triangulation is often misunderstood. Many believe it simply means using “three methods” to collect data. However, triangulation is not about the number three—it’s about cross-verifying evidence from multiple sources or perspectives to improve the credibility, reliability, and depth of research findings. This approach prevents … Read more

Why Cross-Sectional Studies Can’t Prove Causation

by
Why Cross-Sectional Studies Can’t Prove Causation

What is a Cross-Sectional Study? A cross-sectional study collects data from a sample at one point in time. It can identify associations between variables — for instance, between sleep quality and stress levels — but because exposures and outcomes are measured simultaneously, the sequence of events remains unknown. Biology Insights These studies are efficient, cost-effective, … Read more

Mediator vs Moderator: Key Differences in Research Models

by
Mediator vs Moderator Key Differences in Research Models

In empirical research, mistaking mediators for moderators (or vice versa) is surprisingly common. Yet the distinction is critical for valid inference, model specification, and publication success. Below, we dig into the conceptual, statistical, and practical nuances—especially those many researchers overlook. Conceptual Foundations In other words: Baron & Kenny’s classic 1986 formulation laid this foundation in … Read more